solution

/in /by
Read the “A MIR Kiss?” case below. Then answer the following. Please number your answers.” 1. Identify the different conflict episodes that exist in this case? Who conflicted with whom? 2. What are the structural sources of conflict for each of these conflict incidents? 3. What conflict management style(s) did Lapierre, the international team, and Gushin use to resolve these conflicts? What style(s) would have worked best in these situations? 4. What conflict management interventions were applied here? Did they work? What alternative strategies would work best in this situation and in the future? CASE 1 A MIR KISS? By Steven L. McShane, Curtin University (Australia) and University of Victoria (Canada) A team of psychologists at Moscow’s Institute for Biomedical Problems (IBMP) wanted to learn more about the dynamics of long term isolation in space This knowledge would be applied to the International Space Station, a joint project of several countries that would send people into space for more than six months. It would eventually include a trip to Mars taking up to three years. IBMP set up a replica of the Mir space station in Moscow. It then arranged for three international researchers from Japan. Canada and Austria to spend 110 days isolated in a chamber the size of a train car.Read the a mir kiss? case below. then answer the following. please number your answers. 1. identify the different conflict episodes that exist in this case? who conflicted with whom? 2. what are the structural sources of conflict for each of these conflict incidents? 3. what conflict management style(s) did lapierre, the international team, and gushin use to resolve these conflicts? what style(s) would have worked best in these situations? 4. what conflict management interventions were applied here? did they work? what alternative strategies would work best in this situation and in the future?CASE 1 a mir kiss? by steven l. mcshane, curtin university (australia) and university of victoria (canada) a team of psychologists at moscows institute for biomedical problems (ibmp) wanted to learn more about the dynamics of long term isolation in space this knowledge would be applied to the international space station, a joint project of several countries that would send people into space for more than six months. it would eventually include a trip to mars taking up to three years. ibmp set up a replica of the mir space station in moscow. it then arranged for three international researchers from japan. canada and austria to spend 110 days isolated in a chamber the size of a train car. thus chamber joined a smaller chamber where four russian cosmonauts had already completed half of their 240 days of isolation this was the first time an international crew was involved in the studies. none of the participants spoke english as their first language, yet they communicated throughout their stay in english at varying levels of proficiency judith lapierre, a french-canadian, was the only female in the experiment along with a phd in public health and social medicine lapierre studied space sociology at the international space university in france, and conducted isolation research in the antarctic this was her fourth trip to russia. where she had learned the language. the missson was supposed to have a second female participant from the japanese space program, but she was not selected by ibmp the japanese and austrian participants viewed the participation of a woman as a favorable factor, says lapierre. for example, to make the surroundings more comfortable, they rearranged the furniture, hung posters on the wall, and put a tablecloth on the kitchen table twe adapted our environment. whereas the russians just viewed it as something to be endured, she explains. we decorated for christmas, because im the kind of person who likes to host people new years eve turmoil ironically, it was at one of those social eveots, the new years eve party, that esents took a turn for the worse after drinking vodka (allowed by the russian space ageney), two of the russion cosmonauts got into a fistfight that left blood splattered on the chamber walls. ar one point, a collesgue hid the knives in the station kitchen because of feors that the two russians were about to stab each other the two cosmonauts, who generally did not get along, had to be restrained by other men soon after that brawl, the rusiann commander grabbed lapierre, dragged her out of view of ithe television monitoring cameras, and kissed her aggressively twice lapierre fought him off, but the message didnt register. he tried to kiss her again the next morningThe next day, the international crew complained to ibmp about the behavior of the russian cosmonauts the russian institute apparently took no action against any of the aggressors. instead, the institutes psychologists replied that the incidents were part of the experiment they wanted crew members to solve their personal problems with mature discussion, without asking for outside belp you have to understand that mir is an autonomous object, far away from anything. vadim gushin, the ibmp psychologist in charge of the project, explained after the experiment had ended in march. if the crew cant solre problems among themselves. they cant work together following ibmps response, the international crew wrote a scathing letter to the russian institute and the space agencies involved in the experiment. we had never expected such events to take place in a highly controlled scientific experiment swhere individuals go through a multistep selection process. they wrote. if we had known. we would not have joined it as subjects. the letter also complained about ibmps response to their concerns informed of the new years eve incident, the japanese space program corvened an emergency meeting on january 2nd pace 443 to address the incidents. soon after, the japanese team member quit, apparently shocked by ibmps inaction he was replaced with a russian researcher on the international team. ten days after the fighr-a little over a month after the international eam began the mission the doors between the russian and international crews chambers were barred at the request of the international research team. lapierre later emphasized that this action was taken because of concerns about violence, not the incident involving her a stolen kiss or sexual harassment by the end of the experiment in march, news of the fistfight between the cosmonauts and the commanders attempes to kis lapierre had reached the public. russian scientists attemped to play down the kissing incident by saying that it was one fleeting kiss, a clash of cultures, and a female participant who was too emotional -in the west, some kinds of kissing are regarded as sexual harassment. in our culture irs nothing, said russian scientist vadim gushin in coe interview. in another interview, he explained. the problem of sexual harasment is given a lot of atention in north america but less in europe. in russia it is even less of an issue, not because we are more or less moral than the rest of the world we just have different priorities judith lapierre says the kissang incident was tolerable compared to this reaction from the russian scientists who conducted the experiment they dont get it at all. she complains. they dont think anything is wrong tm more frustrated than ever the worst thing is that they dont realize it was wrong norbert kraft, the austrian scientist on the international team, also disagreed with the russian interpretation of events. theyre trying to protect themselves. he sayn. theyre trying to put the fault on others, but this is not a cultural issoe if a woman doesnt want to be kissed, it is not acceptable
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"