LAW/CRIMINOLOGY CASE STUDY

LAW/CRIMINOLOGY CASE STUDY.

– This assignment is case study, it is broken up into two sections part 1 and part 2 writer must do both parts. The fictional case will be in the ‘uploaded files’ section. – Writer will be provided with 3 pieces of information to source there answer from plus the fictional case. All the needed sources to answer the question will be in the uploaded files section one of the lecture sides uploaded will also provided audio information. WRITER MUST ONLY USE THE SOURCE THAT I HAVE PROVIDED. Journal article- The article ‘Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations’, Kassin, S. et al Lecture slides 1- integration and false confessions Lecture slides 2- false confessions – the law and practice in Victoria plus Audio Part 1 -(maximum total words allowed: 1000). (a) You are a respected criminologist with detailed knowledge of the literature on false confessions. You have been asked by Roland’s lawyer to prepare a written opinion describing and analysing the features of this case that support the argument(s) that Roland’s confessions were falsely made. [Guide only – approximately 750 words] (B)If such a case occurred in Victoria today, what, if any, legal protections exist that reduce the chance that such a false confession would be made? [Guide only – approximately 250 words Part 2 –(maximum total words allowed: 500). To ensure that mistakes like the ones made in the Ronald Cotton case do not occur here in Australia, describe how police can: a) best communicate with eyewitnesses during interviews to protect against memory interference/contamination; and b) best conduct visual identification procedures to ensure that only reliable identification evidence is obtained.

LAW/CRIMINOLOGY CASE STUDY

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"