One of the primary purposes of a judgeĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s opinion is to explain the courtĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s reasoning in a particular case. A judgeĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s opinion is not arbitrary, in the sense that a judge must give due consideration to relevant facts and rules of law for any legal issue. From a judgeĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s opinion, we are, therefore, able to know not only a judgeĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s conclusion but also why the judge ruled for one party over another. These opinions provide the courtĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s rationale in a particular case, which may later be used as precedent for subsequent cases that contain similar fact patterns. In Case 16-2, the judge provided several reasons to support the conclusion. The next two questions relate to the judgeĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s reasoning in Case 16-2.
1. What reasons did the judge provide for ruling in favor of the defendant? Clue: To ensure that you have found a reason, ask yourself whether what you have listed answers the question: Ă˘â‚¬Ĺ“Why did the court rule for the defendant?Ă˘â‚¬Âť
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You wonâ€™t have to worry about the quality and deadlinesOrder Paper Now
2. What aspects of the courtĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s reasoning were particularly strong or weak? (Remember that just because reasons are given does not mean that these reasons are necessarily strong.) Clue: Reverse the roles in this case and assume that you are the plaintiffĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s lawyer. With which parts of the judgeĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s opinion would you still disagree based on the courtĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s reasoning? Would there be parts of the judgeĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s reasoning with which, even though you were the opposing party, you would agree?