YOU DO NOT HAVE TO USE THE ABOVE REFERENCES, BUT IF YOU LOOK THEM UP AND THEY ARE USEFUL THAT IS FINE TOO. I DONâT REMEMBER WHY I THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE GOOD. I JUST PASTED THEM ON HERE AT THE TIME.
POSSIBLE OUTLINEÂ BELOW OR YOU CAN SOMETHING DIFFERENT IF YOU THINK IT WOULD BE BETTERÂ BASED ON THE INFORMATION IN THE POWERPOINT IN AND THE OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.
1.Introduction â what is the purpose of the paper
2.Background to the organization
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You wonât have to worry about the quality and deadlinesOrder Paper Now
3.Based on the interviews what are the successes and issues with the four areas
4.aSuggestions about ways to fix the problems based on model 1
Strengths weaknesses â why is this the best to use.
Apply model 1. to problem
4.bModel 2 info- same as model 1
- Model statement of philosophy
- Conclusion wrap up what was written and what was learned.
Like I said another format could be better if you and your colleagues think so. Some ideas to think about below. They may help give you some food for thought or you may want to go another direction.
In the 1930s, Kurt Lewin developed a framework based on a leaderâs behavior. He argued that there are three types of leaders:
- Autocratic leadersÂ make decisions without consulting their teams. This style of leadership is considered appropriate when decisions need to be made quickly, when thereâs no need for input, and when team agreement isnât necessary for a successful outcome.
- Democratic leadersÂ allow the team to provide input before making a decision, although the degree of input can vary from leader to leader. This style is important when team agreement matters, but it can be difficult to manage when there are lots of different perspectives and ideas.
- Laissez-faire leadersÂ donât interfere; they allow people within the team to make many of the decisions. This works well when the team is highly capable, is motivated, and doesnât need close supervision. However, this behavior can arise because the leader is lazy or distracted; and this is where this style of leadership can fail.
Clearly, how leaders behave affects their performance. Researchers have realized, though, that many of these leadership behaviors are appropriate at different times. The best leaders are those who can use many different behavioral styles, and choose the right style for each situation.
â top down communication not as effective. Two-way communication more effective. Better communication may lead to higher morale higher morale may lead to better innovation and performance. Need at least two theories or theorists to back this type of rationale up in the paper.
Approachable- leaders should be approachable âÂ first step in effective communication is to be approachable
Not Being Assertive enough could have drawbacksÂ Â (in opposition to Follett and Maslowâs theories)
I took the below from a site called Mindtools. It may even help you with your future assignments. Of course this website isnât allowed asÂ a scholarly source but it does give some good insights I think.
is about stating what you need, while considering the wants and needs of others.
You may not always get your way when youâre assertive, but you stand a better chance of doing so, or of reaching a compromise, because youâve been clear about your needs. Use our Bite-Sized Training session onÂ Assertiveness SkillsÂ to identify your needs, and to practice assertive communication.
Assertiveness also means saying ânoâ when you need to. Our article ââYesâ to the Person, âNoâ to the Taskâ
explains how to turn down requests gently but assertively, while maintaining good relationships.
Mistake 7: Using a âOne-Size-Fits-Allâ Approach to Communication
If you use a âone-size-fits-allâ approach to communication, you may overlook peopleâs different personalities, needs and expectations. In fact, your communications need to address those differences as much as possible.
If youâre preparing a presentation, make sure that you appreciate that people have differentÂ learning styles
, and that you cater for these. This means that everyone â from those who learn best by reading to those who prefer a more hands-on approach â can benefit from your session.