Saul sold goods to Bruce, warranting that the goods were of a specified quality. The goods were not of the quality warranted, however, and Saul knew this at the time of the sale. Bruce drew and delivered a check payable to Saul and drawn on Third National Bank in the amount of the purchase price. Bruce subsequently discovered the goods were faulty and stopped payment on the check. Third National refused to pay Saul on the check.

a. What are the arguments that Saul can recover (1) from Bruce and (2) from Third National?

b. What are the arguments that (1) Bruce should prevail? and (2) Third National should prevail?

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

c. Who should prevail? Why?

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"