Which one of the following choices would you choose in managing poor employee performance, and explain why in detail:
A. Doing nothing is always an option worth considering. Clearly, there is always some risk in
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You wonâ€™t have to worry about the quality and deadlinesOrder Paper Now
taking action to improve someoneĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s performance.
B. There are plenty of ways to get rid of a poor performance: formal dismissal, redundancy,
sideways moves, Ă˘â‚¬ËśspecialĂ˘â‚¬â„˘ projects, making life so uncomfortable that the person resigns
(but beware the risk of Ă˘â‚¬Ëśconstructive dismissalĂ˘â‚¬â„˘), to mention but a few.
C. Telling a poor performer that they must improve is a tempting, straightforward option.
D. Persuading someone to improve their performance is an option worth trying.
E. Training is an option that may well be helpful if the poor performers accept the need.
F. Performance is sometimes a product not just of the person, but also of the circumstances, and environment. Changing the situation in order to bring about performance improvements is an option worth considering.