Sandy borrowed out an electric scooter from JimĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s Scooters, a self-serviced operation, for the first time. The scooters can be found at various stations around town and are locked in charging stations whilst they are not in use. There was a sign on a pillar next to the scooters that listed the various charges and conditions. It also stated that users needed to download their app to use a scooter and included a QR code for quick reference. Once she found a scooter she wanted to use, Sandy was issued with a ticket through the associated app. Sandy was injured later when she returned the scooter into the locking mechanism. Sandy claimed damages from JimĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s Scooters. The company attempted to rely on a condition exempting it from liability. On each ticket, in small print, were the words Ă˘â‚¬ËśIssued subject to conditions . . . displayed at the scooter stationĂ˘â‚¬â„˘. On the pillar next to the scooters were printed eight conditions, the second of which exempted JimĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s Scooters from liability for any injury to a customer whilst parking the scooter.
Required: Could JimĂ˘â‚¬â„˘s Scooters successfully rely on the exemption clause to protect it from any action by Sandy? (Note: The IRAC method may be helpful in answering this question) (Word limit: Maximum 500 words)
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You wonâ€™t have to worry about the quality and deadlinesOrder Paper Now