Anthropology

Anthropology.

Anthropology 130 Research Simulation 2

Preparing to go to Tibet
 50 points total

Instructions

This assignment will go over how biological adaptations can allow people to survive in

high altitude environments. Just as there are different ways that people have adapted to

hot and cold environments, people living in high altitudes today possess traits that allow

them to thrive where others would have a very hard time.

A section at the Understanding Evolution website describes what anthropologists have

found when studying a group of Tibetans who were apparently adapted to high altitude

living. The webpage contains both text and video interviews explaining the concept. This

week’s assignment involves thinking about this case study and linking it to what we

have learned.

Type your answers into the separate answer sheet, which is just a list of numbers.

Answers can be incomplete sentence unless otherwise stated in the question.

Assignment Start

Fresh from your trip to the Philippines, you run into your anthropology instructor! He

wants your help on a research project:

“It’s great that I ran into you since you know about anthropology. I am working on a

study of human biological adaptation to hypoxia at high altitude. While we have cultural

� of �1 11

 

 

adaptations today, such as oxygen tanks, people who have traditionally lived in high

altitude have picked up biological traits from natural selection that give them an

advantage in that extreme environment.” Thinking that this is a great way to get another

adventure under your belt, you keep listening.

Part One – Hypoxia and Acclimatization

Your instructor continues: “I actually have experience traveling to a high elevation area

during my studies. During one trip to PerĂş to conduct a study on ancient human health

and disease, I had some spare time to see the wonderful country. I wanted to see

Machu Picchu and Cusco, which is 11,150 feet above sea level. When I was planning

the trip, I received a lot of advice about adjusting to the altitude. One thing that I heard

was that I should never run or even walk fast on the first day there.”

You feel that you should reply and continue the conversation: answer the following

questions based on the lecture or textbook material on hypoxia. You can also search the

Internet, but you have to phrase the answer in your own way and you are responsible

for the trustworthiness of the information you find.

1. How does hypoxia harm the body? Answer in at least one sentence. (2 points)

Your instructor welcomes your response and continues his story: “I flew to Cusco and

made an effort to not exert myself. The air really did feel thinner than I was used to!

After a few days, I felt that I could be more active, though I still could not run.”

� of �2 11

 

 

2. What biological acclimatizations did your instructor’s body activate to adjust to the high altitude to make him feel a little better? Answer in at least one sentence. (2 points)

“Yeah, you get it! Giving myself time to adapt to the environment resulted in a great trip

to the Andes mountains. I even made it to Machu Picchu, one of the UNESCO World

Heritage Sites and a gorgeous location.” Your instructor pulls out his phone and flips

through his photos before showing one to you. “This is me at Machu Picchu!”

{ Caption: “I still have those boots!” }

“When I returned to sea level, my adaptations made me more physically able for a little

while. I could exert myself like I have never done before. It was like having

superpowers! My adaptations faded, though, since they were temporary by definition.”

� of �3 11

 

 

Part Two – Hypoxia and Genetic Adaptations

You agree to help your instructor’s research project. “I’ve heard that studies of native

Tibetan populations have found some evidence of biological adaptations. My own

undergraduate school, U.C. Berkeley, has a write-up of these findings as part of their

Understanding Evolution website. (Fun fact: I took an undergraduate class with the

researcher in charge of that site, Dr. Roy Caldwell.) Could you go there and tell me what

you find?” Ready to get to work, you find a computer and go to the website that your

instructor suggested:

A. Go the webpage “Evolving altitude aptitude” in the Understanding Evolution site at

the following address: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/101001_altitude

B. Read the text, but stop before the “Discussion and extension questions” section. I

have my own questions! You can also watch the videos, but they are not required for

these questions.

C. Answer the following questions. Direct answers can be found in the article, so don’t

look in other sites.

The “Evolving altitude aptitude” article mentions that the Tibetans are genetically

adapted to high altitude since their population have lived in that environment for

thousands of years.

3. At approximately what altitude do Tibetans live? (1 point)

4. What do the bodies of the Tibetans do to adapt to the thinner air that is not seen in other people? (2 points)

� of �4 11

 

 

Researchers conclude that a certain allele in a gene called EPAS1 allows the Tibetans

to adapt to high altitude compared to the low altitude-living Han Chinese nearby.

5. For all people, the EPAS1 gene codes for a protein that does what for the human body? (2 points)

6. How many years ago did the Tibetan and Han Chinese lineages separate, leading to different genetic trajectories? (1 point)

Since the article was first written, a new discovery has added more knowledge about

the Tibetan EPAS1 allele. This discovery is described in a 2014 update inside a blue

box on the webpage. The update gives us a glimpse into future lecture topics on human

ancestors.

7. What is the name of the ancient human group that also had the Tibetan hypoxia- adapted EPAS1 allele? (2 points)

8. Where did this ancient human live? And around how many years ago did they live? Look for the specific answers! (2 points)

9. Based on the updated information, what is the researchers’ explanation of how the prehistoric ancestors of Tibetans first got the hypoxia-adapted EPAS1 allele? (2 points)

Part Three – Allele Frequencies

You start to see how the course topics are connected to each other. Wanting to learn

more, you search on Google Scholar to learn more about Tibetan adaptations to

� of �5 11

 

 

hypoxia. A paper by Xin Yi and over twenty other authors (!!) (2011) has data on EPAS1

allele frequencies in the Tibetan and Han populations. The researchers found that the

frequency of the hypoxia-adapted allele in Tibetans is 0.87. You remember that the

frequency scale goes from 0.0 to 1.0, with 0.0 meaning the allele is not there at all, and

1.0 meaning that everyone has the same allele.

10. If the frequency of the hypoxia-adapted allele in Tibetans is 0.87, then what is the

frequency of the non-hypoxia-adapted allele in Tibetans? For a gene with two

alleles, the frequency of one allele equals 1.0 minus the frequency of the other

allele. (2 points)

11. In the Tibetan population, is the hypoxia-adapted EPAS1 allele more common, or is

the non-hypoxia-adapted allele more common? (1 point)

The Yi paper states that the Han Chinese allele frequencies are 0.10 for the hypoxia-

adapted EPAS1 allele and 0.90 for the non-hypoxia-adapted allele.

12. Which EPAS1 allele is more common in the Han Chinese population, hypoxia-

adapted or non-hypoxia-adapted? (1 point)

13. Based on these results, do you think that gene flow between the Tibetans and Han

Chinese is high or low? (1 point)

The different allele frequencies between Tibetans and Han shows that the hypoxia-

adapted allele is far more common in Tibetans due to the natural selection spreading

� of �6 11

 

 

that allele where it is an adaptation. Outside of Asians, no one has the hypoxia-adapted

EPAS1 allele.

14. What is the number for the frequency of the hypoxia-adapted allele outside of Asia,

based on the above sentence? (2 points)

Part Four – Connections to the Course

You have a good sense of the research on Tibetan adaptation to hypoxia. Satisfied, you

take a short break, but you keep thinking of the discoveries about modern Tibetans. A

lot of the things you learned tie back to what you learned in class. You feel it would be

good to show your instructor these connections in your report. Finishing your break and

feeling refreshed, you get back to writing.

This section has more questions that build off of the article on Tibetan high altitude

adaptation, but are answered using material from the lectures and textbook. The goal is

to form connections across the topics we have learned in class, in order to remember

everything more concretely. The general topic is given for each question to give you a

lead on finding the answer.

15. Genetics: It is confusing that genes and proteins are given the same name, such as EPAS1. Let’s sort them out with the basics. A gene is a section of what type of molecule? (2 points)

16. Genetics: When a gene is used by an organism, the instructions are first transcribed into mRNA, which is then translated into a chain of what other type of molecule as the final step in synthesis? (2 points)

� of �7 11

 

 

The article was focused mostly on genetics. Another way to study Tibetan high altitude

adaptation is to measure their actual lung power and compare them to the Han

Chinese. A new study found that Tibetans had larger and more powerful lungs than the

Han Chinese (Weitz, Garruto, and Chin, 2016). Interestingly, Tibetans must have

developed their more-powerful lungs in their adolescent period since Tibetan and Han

had the same lung power from infancy through the juvenile period.

17. Life History: What is the life history period that spreads new hormones through the body, causing new developments in adolescence? (2 points)

18. Life History: Why is it extremely unlikely for people to develop powerful lungs after the adolescent period? (2 points)

Researchers are still studying the Tibetans to learn more about their biological

adaptations to hypoxia. Anthropologists are also studying the indigenous people of the

Andes Mountains to compare and contrast their biological adaptations with the Tibetans.

Part Five – Textbook Nutrition

Working with allele frequencies was rewarding, but also very tiring. You start to get

hungry, but can’t decide what to eat. For inspiration about essential nutrients, you open

the textbook Essentials of Physical Anthropology by Clark Spencer Larsen. You start

reading at the section “Nutritional Adaptation” and quiz yourself as you go to make sure

that you understand the main points.

19. According to the textbook, what are two consequence of being undernourished? (2

points)

� of �8 11

 

 

20. Based on James Neel’s research, why would a “thrifty genotype” be an adaptation

for prehistoric Native Americans? Answer in at least a whole sentence in your own

words. (3 points)

21. Why would the “thrifty genotype” now be maladaptive in modern times? Think of the

change in environment from prehistoric times to today. Answer in at least a whole

sentence in your own words. (3 points)

Part Six – Thinking About Blood

Not feeling particularly hungry anymore, you put the textbook away and go out to get a

little exercise. You recall how the adaptation to hypoxia in the “Evolving altitude

aptitude” article involved the blood of Tibetans. As you work up a sweat and raise your

pulse, you realize that the topic of blood has appeared in several lectures.

22. Thinking about other types of human adaptation, how is blood flow controlled by the

body in response to an extremely hot environment or to overexerting yourself? (1

point)

23. How is blood flow controlled in an extremely cold environment? (1 point)

24. One lecture described the ABO blood system. With at least a whole sentence,

explain why someone with O blood is a universal donor. Incorporate the word

‘antigen’ correctly in your explanation. (3 points)

“Hey, you! Are you there?”

� of �9 11

 

 

Startled back to your surroundings, you see a good friend peering at you and waving

her hand side-to-side at your face.

“Funny running into you here. Looks like you’re working out too! Hey, you are taking

anthropology. I have a question: I heard that I should eat a diet of mainly dairy products

because I have B type blood. Do you know anything about whether the ‘Blood-Type’ diet

has any scientific research supporting it?” You promise to look up some information.

Back at home, you find a news story from a science website about a team that

scientifically tested the ABO blood-type diet. You email your friend back with information

based on that news story:

A. Go the webpage “Theory behind popular blood-type diet debunked” in the

ScienceDaily site at the following address: https://www.sciencedaily.com/

releases/2014/01/140115172246.htm

B. Read the full story.

C. Write a short paragraph of a few complete sentences that explains the research

to your friend.

25. In a single short paragraph, address the following questions:

A. What is the name of the popular book that started the ABO Blood Type diet idea,

and who is the book’s author? (2 point)

B. Is there evidence that people with different blood types should eat different types

of foods to improve their health? (2 points)

� of �10 11

 

 

C. What types of diets do the researchers recommend to help all people, regardless

of blood type? (2 points)

Hint: start with a thesis statement introducing the topic, such as “I read a news story that

tested the ‘Blood-Type’ diet and made some conclusions.”

The next day, an email arrives in your inbox. “You really learned a lot in that class! Well,

I won’t keep you. Thanks for the info!” Feeling satisfied from helping your friend, you

wrap up the work you have done.

Conclusion

You turn in all of the information you found to your very grateful instructor. “Wow, you

went above and beyond with the connections that you made. This will help a lot as I try

to get funding to go study the Tibetans on their home turf.” He takes a deep breath: “I

hope my lungs are ready!” He runs off to the associate instructor offices.

Be sure to have answered every question in the answer sheet. Please submit the report

sheet under the assignment link in Canvas or hand in a paper copy in class.

References (to the real research featured here if you want more) Wang, J., GarcĂ­a-Bailo, B., Nielsen, D. E., & El-Sohemy, A. (2014). ABO genotype, ‘blood-type’ diet and cardiometabolic risk factors. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e84749.

Weitz, C. A., Garruto, R. M. and Chin, C.-T. (2016), Larger FVC and FEV1 among Tibetans compared to Han born and raised at high altitude. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 159: 244–255.

Yi, X., Liang, Y., Huerta-Sanchez, E., Jin, X., Cuo, Z. X., Pool, J. E., . . . Wang, J. (2010). Sequencing of 50 human exomes reveals adaptation to high altitude. Science, 329(5987), 75-8.

� of �11 11

Anthropology

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Biogeochemical cycles

Biogeochemical cycles.

In this module you have thought about populations, biogeochemical cycles, ecosystems, biomes, the importance of factual evidence, as well as climate change. You also approached viruses from the viewpoint of a nonliving to living interaction. In this final assignment, you will think like an informed citizen. The reintroduction of wolves has been a hot topic in mountain communities, but in your activity you will think about reintroduction of grizzly bears. It is a topic that has been discussed by national park rangers, citizens, wildlife groups, and even tourists. However, you should write your essay from the position of an informed citizen. Feel free to perform more research, as well as use the material provided to write your essay. The questions at the end of the reading passage will help you shape your essay. Welcome to the real world because, as a citizen, you will help make these decisions. It is up to you to make good ones.

You should spend approximately 2.5 hours on this assignment.

Instructions

  1. Read the case information.
  2. Using the questions at the end of the information as a guide, write an essay (300-500 words) on why or why not grizzly bears should be reintroduced to the Bitterroot ecosystem.
  3. Submit your essay to the Module 5 Assignment: Should Grizzly Bears Be Reintroduced Into the Bitterroot Ecosystem?

See the Course Schedule and Course Rubrics sections in the Syllabus module for due dates and grading information.

NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE

“Th e Bear Facts” by Grace A. Wang Page 1

Background Few species have captured the imagination of the American public like the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis). It is one of the largest North American land mammals, with male grizzly bears often reaching 7 feet tall, weighing 300–600 pounds, and female grizzly bears 200–400 pounds. Th ey are an omnivorous species, with a diet that includes elk carcasses, sometimes sheep, berries, and whitebark pine seeds, among other items.

Although grizzly bears historically ranged throughout most of the western United States, habitat loss and excessive human-caused mortality have drastically reduced numbers of this species. It is estimated that prior to European settlement there were ~50,000 grizzly bears; it is estimated that only 800–1,000 grizzly bears exist on approximately 2 percent of their historic range in the lower 48 states now. Biologically, grizzly bears have the second slowest reproductive rate of all North American mammals, making it diffi cult for them to rebound from threats to their survival. Females reach maturity at 4–9 years, and generally give birth to two cubs every three years.

The Endangered Species Act Congress enacted the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Th e ESA declared national policy “that all Federal departments and agencies shall seek to conserve endangered species and threatened species and shall utilize their authorities in furtherance of the purposes of this [Act].” Th e ESA defi nes an endangered species as “any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a signifi cant portion of its range.” A threatened species is defi ned as “any species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a signifi cant portion of its range.” Four key sections of the ESA provide its basic structure:

• A formal listing process used to identify threatened and endangered species, protect critical habitats, and the drafting of recovery plans.

• Federal agency consultation with the appropriate Secretary (Interior or Commerce) before taking any action that might aff ect a listed species.

• Prohibition of the “taking” of listed species and damage to their habitats. Th e term “take” means to “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.”

• Penalties for violations of the ESA. Grizzly bears were listed as a threatened species in the lower 48 states in 1975. At that time, the Bitterroot Ecosystem (BE) was listed as one of three areas where grizzly bears were known or thought to exist and where recovery should be emphasized. Earlier in the 20th century, grizzly bears were widespread inhabitants of the Bitterroot Mountains in central Idaho and western Montana, although the last verifi ed death of a grizzly bear in the BE occurred in 1932 and

The Bear Facts: Grizzly Recovery in the Bitterroot Ecosystem by Grace A. Wang School of Forest Resources, The Pennsylvania State University

 

 

NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE

“Th e Bear Facts” by Grace A. Wang Page 2

the last tracks were observed in 1946. No verifi ed tracks or sightings have been documented in more than 50 years, and the best scientifi c evidence available indicates that there are no grizzly bears in the BE at this time.

Figure 1. Map of Grizzly Bear Ecosystems in the northern Rocky Mountains.

Grizzly Bear ecosystems Bitterroot Ecosystem

The Recovery Plan In 1982, a federal grizzly bear recovery plan by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) called for the evaluation of the BE as a potential recovery area. Ensuing studies indicated suffi cient habitat existed in the BE to support 200–400 grizzly bears. In 1991, the Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee endorsed the BE as a recovery area and authorized the FWS to pursue grizzly bear recovery. Th e ultimate long-term goal of the plan is removal of the grizzly bear from threatened status in the lower 48 states.

The Draft Environmental Impact Statement Th e FWS released a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) in 1997, describing four alternatives that represent diff erent approaches to grizzly bear recovery and management in the Bitterroot Ecosystem of central Idaho and western Montana:

Alternative 1. Reintroduction of a Nonessential Experimental Population Alternative Section 10(j) of the Endangered Species Act provides the authority to designate certain populations of listed species as nonessential “experimental populations” to promote species conservation. Th is designation is more fl exibe than “endangered” and allows private landowners some fl exibility in dealing with reintroduced arenas. Th e goal of this alternative is to accomplish grizzly bear recovery by reintroducing grizzly bears designated as a nonessential experimental population to the Bitterroot Ecosystem. Central to this is creation of a Citizen Management Committee (CMC) to conduct grizzly bear management within the framework of local concerns. Th e CMC would be given the task of managing this grizzly bear population.

 

 

NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE

“Th e Bear Facts” by Grace A. Wang Page 3

Alternative 2. The No Action Alternative—Natural Recovery Th e goal of this alternative is to allow grizzly bears to expand from their current range in north Idaho and northwestern Montana southward into central Idaho and western Montana, and to recolonize the BE. Ultimately, the goal is natural recovery of grizzly bears in the BE.

Alternative 3. The No Grizzly Bear Alternative Th e purpose of this alternative is to prevent grizzly bears from naturally re-establishing in the BE. Congress would need to pass legislation to remove grizzly bears in central Idaho and portions of western Montana from the list of threatened species. Th e FWS would stop all funding and management activity toward bear research, education, and management in central Idaho. Th e states of Idaho and Montana would remove grizzly bears from the protection of state law within the BE.

Alternative 4. Reintroduction of a Threatened Popula- tion with Full Protection of the ESA Th e goal of this alternative is to achieve recovery through reintroduction and extensive habitat protection and enhancement to promote natural recovery. Th e grizzly bear would have full status as a threatened species under the provisions of the ESA.

Th ese four alternatives represent diff erent approaches to grizzly bear recovery and management. Th ey were developed for evaluation in the DEIS because they encompass public concerns raised during scoping and to refl ect a full range of alternatives. Two alternatives (Alternatives 2 and 3) do not necessarily meet the purpose of and need for action, but were included in the DEIS to be responsive to public comments, to provide a full range of alternatives for consideration, and to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA ensures that environmental factors are weighted equally when compared to other factors in the decision making process undertaken by federal agencies. As part of this, NEPA requires that federal agencies prepare an environmental impact statement for projects they are requesting funding for from Congress. All four alternatives in the DEIS refl ect public comments and suggestions identifi ed through issue and alternative scoping.

Stakeholders / Public Concerns • Governor Phil Batt of Idaho and Senator Conrad Burns of Montana argue that grizzly reintroduction will lock

up the region’s timber reserves while jeopardizing the safety of constituents in the area: “Reintroduction will pose a signifi cant public safety risk for Idaho’s citizens, and many tourists who visit our wilderness areas.”

• Ravalli County Commissioner (Montana) Jerry Allen tells the federal government: “We don’t want the bears. I’m worried about the livestock and about the safety of my neighbors.”

• Some comments from other local citizens:

Figure 2. Grizzly Bear Recovery Alternatives in the Bitterroot Ecosystem.

 

 

NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE

“Th e Bear Facts” by Grace A. Wang Page 4

“Grizzly bears attack people, and unlike the Fish & Wildlife Service, I do not believe there is an acceptable level of injury and death caused by grizzly bears.”

“We do not need our forests and other public lands shut down and put people out of jobs to encourage the grizzlies to roam into our backyards and endanger our lives.”

• Logging representative Jim Riley: “I don’t claim to speak for all loggers; but in general we are not afraid of living with grizzlies. What we fear most is having the federal government come in here and shut down traditional forms of resource extraction like logging to accommodate bears.”

• Th e environmental group Defenders of Wildlife supports reintroduction of the grizzly bears as an “experimental population,” and would like to set aside ~5,785 square miles of territory, allowing logging and grazing in the outlying areas. More signifi cantly, their plan allows for a team of “citizen managers” to voice local concerns. Hank Fischer of Defenders says: “Th is is a struggle between the purists and the pragmatists—and we’re the pragmatists. Any plan that puts people second to bears just isn’t going to fl y. If you don’t have the support of locals, these wildlife populations simply won’t survive.”

• Th e environmental group Alliance for the Wild Rockies champions a plan that would give full protection under the ESA, allowing federal biologists to manage reintroduction while keeping politics at bay. Th ey call for setting aside ~21,645 square miles of territory for reintroduction. Alliance executive director Mike Bader counters the Defenders plan: “Th e only thing that got compromised in [the Defenders] plan is the grizzly bear; introducing grizzlies without signifi cant habitat protection is like boarding them on a sinking ship.”

Questions 1. What are the major issues—economic, safety, animal rights, civil right—for each stakeholder group? 2. Are the opinions of local citizens more or less important than those of decisions makers in Washington D.C.?

Why or why not? 3. Given that reintroduction will occur on federal public lands, how important are the opinions of all citizens? Do

you think that non-local citizens should have a say in grizzly bear reintroduction? 4. How important are local fi nancial concerns in the decision to reintroduce grizzly bears? And which businesses

are most likely to benefi t or lose? 5. Taking all factors into consideration, which alternative truly benefi ts the grizzly bear population? 6. What are the ecological concerns related to grizzly bear reintroduction? 7. Which is more important in this case: the process or the outcome? 8. How might grizzly bear reintroduction aff ect the diff erent extractive industries (mining, timber, grazing)? 9. Why might diff erent environmental groups disagree?

References Blanchard, Bonnie M., and Richard R. Knight. “Biological Consequences of Relocating Grizzly Bears in the

Yellowstone Ecosystem.” Journal of Wildlife Management 59 (1995): 560–65. Eberhardt, L.L., and R.R. Knight. “How Many Grizzlies in Yellowstone?” Journal of Wildlife Management 60 (1996):

416–21. Fischer, Hank. “Bears and the Bitterroot.” Defenders Winter 1996/97:16+. Garshelis, David L. “Th e Grizzly Bears of Yellowstone: Th eir Ecology in the Yellowstone Ecosystem, 1959–1992.”

American Scientist January/February 1997: 72.

“Historic Plan Paves Way for Grizzlies’ Return to Idaho’s Bitterroot Region.” National Wildlife December/January 1996: 60+. “Montanans Learning to Live with Grizzly Bears.” Environmental News Network 29 September 1998:

http://www.enn.com/news/enn-stories/1998/09/092998/bears25.asp.

 

 

NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE

“Th e Bear Facts” by Grace A. Wang Page 5

Credits: Grizzly Bear from Summary of the Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1993. Figures 1 and 2 redrawn by Jim Stamos (UB Dept. of Biological Sciences) from Chapter 2, fi gures 2–3 and 2–2 respectively, of the Grizzly Bear Recovery in the Bitterroot Ecosystem: Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Missoula, Montana: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, July 1997.

Case copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buff alo, State University of New York. Originally published June 1, 1999. Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.

Oko, Dan. “Dispatches: Th e Debate Th at Roared.” Outside March 1998: http://outsideonline.com/outside/magazine/0398/9803dispwildlife.html.

Peacock, Doug. “Making the West Safe for Grizzlies.” Audubon November/December 1997: 46+. “Th e Possible Link.” http://www.defenders.org/defenders/grizgene.html. Quammen, David. “Island of the Bears.” Audubon March/April 1995: 82+.

“Grizzly Bear Reintroduction.” National Wildlife Federation: http://www.nwf.org/nwf/grizzly/index.html. Rembert, Tracey C., and Jim Motavalli. “Troubled Homecoming: Th rough Reintroduction Programs, Predators are

Returning to the Wild, Challenging our Expectations and Fears.” E March/April 1998: 28+. Robbins, Jim. “Scientists are Disputing the Fate of the Grizzly.” New York Times 23 June 1998: B12. Stevens, William K. “Debating Nature of Nature in Yellowstone.” New York Times 23 June 1998: B9+. United States. Department of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service. Grizzly Bear Recovery in the Bitterroot Ecosystem: Draft

Environmental Impact Statement. Missoula, Montana: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, July 1997. ___. ___. Fish and Wildlife Service. Grizzly Bear Recovery in the Bitterroot Ecosystem: Summary of the Draft

Environmental Impact Statement. Missoula, Montana: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, July 1997. Waller, John S., and Richard D. Mace. “Grizzly Bear Habitat Selection in the Swan Mountains, Montana.” Journal of

Wildlife Management 61 (1997): 1032–39. Wuethrich, Bernie. “Wayward Grizzlies Spark Debate.” Science 25 October 1996: 493. Young, Donald D., Jr., and Th omas R. McCabe. “Grizzly Bear Predation Rates on Caribou Calves in Northeastern

Alaska.” Journal of Wildlife Management 61 (1997): 1056–66. ___. “Grizzly Bears and Calving Caribou: What is the Relation with River Corridors?” Journal of Wildlife Management

62 (1998): 255–61.

•

 

Biogeochemical cycles

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Biology Cell Discussion Board

Biology Cell Discussion Board. BEFORE POSTING ANYTHING…..Read These Instructions! AttachmentCOLLAPSEOverall Rating:

Discussion Activity #1 Instructions (25 pts total)

For this discussion activity, I want you to use creativity and your understanding of cells and their structures to produce an original work that demonstrates your understanding of cells and their organelles and other cellular structures. Then, I want you to review each other’s original works and provide helpful feedback for improving the submission. Finally, you’ll revise your own work in response to your feedback, and then post the final version in your concluding post at the end of the week.

—————————————————————-
Prompt for your original essay post (12 pts), due by FRIDAY of the assigned week:

Before starting, choose to describe either a prokaryote (such as bacteria) or a eukaryote (such as an animal or plant cell) and make it clear in your post’s subject line which cell type you chose. Then, choose the TYPE of creative work you want to produce (see examples and suggestions below). Finally, make sure to include at least five (5) different organelles or sub-cellular structures in your original work as you create it.

Examples of creative/original works you could produce:

  • If you are an artist, create a work of art that tells the story of the cell you select in a drawing. As an artist, your work should be creative, not a tracing or copy of a figure from your book. Show us what YOU see.
  • If you are a musician or songwriter, compose a song about the cell you selected and type up the lyrics (and record yourself singing it as an audio file if you can).
  • If you are a poet, write a poem about your cell (not a haiku, please! that’s too short!)
  • If you want to be a teacher, create an activity that students could do to help them learn about the parts of the cell you chose and post the activity (post it without answers shown, but attach a file with the answers for students to look at after they’ve done it on their own).
  • If you like math, write about the relative dimensions of your cell and its component parts in relation to something we can visualize on a human scale. For example, if a cell were expanded to the size of a golf ball, how big would the nucleus be, then?
  • If you like politics and government, write an essay that uses a city as a metaphor for how a cell functions. What cellular structures/organelles could different parts of the city government and city services represent?

You don’t have to use one of these suggestions — be creative and come up with your own cell presentation!

Publish your original work as a NEW THREAD in this discussion forum. Please type a subject line that includes your cell type and creative title, then type/paste your original work directly into the text editor box so it shows up directly in the discussion board. Do NOT attach any files unless you created an audio or video file.

Here is an example of what a student in a previous semester submitted as his original work.  Yours does not need to be this great – I picked a really great example so you’d have an idea of how creative you could be. 🙂

—————————————————————-
Prompt for your response posts (4 pts each, 8 pts total), due by SATURDAY of the assigned week of discussion:

Read everyone’s posted original works and select at least TWO CLASSMATES for replies. Reply to these classmates, including the following elements:

  • A greeting (directed to the original writer) – i.e. say hello (preferably using their name).
  • A closing (sign off with your name) – i.e say a closing word (like “Regards” or “Great Job!” and then YOUR NAME (so they know how to address you if/when they respond to your feedback).
  • In between the greeting and closing: A response to what they wrote (in paragraph form with proper grammar/style) of at least 3-4 sentences providing:
    • at least one piece of positive feedback AND
    • at least one area where they could improve their original work.
  • Check grammar and spelling. This is a college-level course, so your writing should reflect that.
  • Follow the Netiquette rules provided in the “Getting Started” section of eCampus – be constructive, positive in tone, and helpful! Do not attack or insult!
  • I also want you to try to help everyone, so if a post already has a reply, find a different post to reply to if you can.

—————————————————————-
Prompt for your SUMMARY / CONCLUDING post (5 pts), due on SUNDAY of the assigned week of discussion:

Review all of the original and response posts, then EDIT/IMPROVE your original work based on the feedback and anything you wanted to add. Even if you did not receive any replies or suggestions, you still need to make at least one improvement to your original submission and post the final version in its entirety along with a brief description of what you changed. To post your conclusion, make sure to select the “reply” to YOUR original post so it is nested in the correct location on the forum. Do NOT create a new thread for the conclusion.

Do NOT write your conclusion and final version until after Saturday night so all your classmates have time to respond and provide feedback to you by the reply deadline. Posting your conclusion too early will result in lost points.

A grading rubric will be used to calculate your grade on this discussion.  You are welcome to review the rubric to see how I will determine your score BEFORE you write your posts. A copy of the rubric is available in the grade book (in the Discussion Activity grade information).

Do NOT reply to this thread. Return to the main forum page and create a new thread for your original post.

Biology Cell Discussion Board

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Gastrointestinal Disorders Case

Gastrointestinal Disorders Case. BIO/1015 Week 4 Assignment 1 Discussion Question (***** Both Questions Answered + APA Format + Original Work + References ******)

 

Question 1

 

Alcohol Abuse

 

 

Mr. Wilko is a 40-year-old salesperson with a wife and three teenage children. He has recently begun to have a beer at lunch and a few drinks after work to reduce his work-related stress. An economic downturn in the housing industry has reduced the need for new home appliances and his income and sales record has been affected. Several other salespeople have been laid off at his firm. He has been told that if his sales and attendance records do not improve he will be fired. He and his wife are constantly arguing about finances and the children’s increasing demands for money. His drinking has increased to several beers at lunch and continued drinking after dinner. When he returns to work with alcohol on his breath, he is dismissed from his job. He continues to consume alcohol during the day as he attempts a job search. His wife is very concerned, as are his teenage children.

  • Mr. Wilko states he is a social drinker and “can stop at any time.” How accurate is his self-assessment? his self -assessment is not accurate for the simple fact that he considers himself a social drinker he is in denial that depression has set in.
  • What stressors are present in Mr. Wilko’s case? anxiety,depression
  • Why does Mr. Wilko continue to increase his alcohol intake? to surpress the feelings on depression or fear of losing his job he feels as if he continues to increase his drinking it will subside the feelings that he is having
  • What changes in liver function can Mr. Wilko expect if he continues to drink large amounts of alcohol? his liver function
  • Mr. Wilko complains to his wife that all the stress is causing “indigestion.” How do stress and alcohol consumption affect GI function?
  • Why is Mr. Wilko at greater risk of trauma? because he is consuming way too much alcohol at an increasing rate above normal which can lead to gastritis as well as pancreatitis

 

 

Question 2

 

Gastrointestinal Disorders Case

 

A 50-year-old man has been suffering from substernal pain for the last 5 months, particularly on waking up in the morning. He lost his job a year ago and was suffering from depression. He consumes about 12–16 cans of beer every day. He has lost his appetite too and says that eating aggravates pain.

  • Is this acute or chronic gastritis?  Chronic gastritis
  • What factors may lead to the development of gastritis? Loss of appetite black or tarry stools upset stomach depression
  • What investigation should be performed?
  • How can the patient be treated?

 

BIO 1015 Week 4

Week 4 assignments pathophysiology

 

Gastrointestinal Disorders Case

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"