dolution

dolution.

Franklin Harris, a small time drug dealer and local gang member, is having a get together at his apartment. People are outside on his back porch partying. During the course of the party, Sally Martin becomes pretty intoxicated. At one point, John Smith starts trying to get friendly with her. People don’t really notice what’s going on, but ultimately, Smith rips Martin’s shirt. She runs out of the party crying down the street to her cousin’s house. She tells her cousin, Zach Klien, about what happened. Klein, along with his friend, Joe Gibson, walk down to the party armed with handguns.

Once in the back yard, they start arguing with Smith. A fight breaks out among several people and gun shots erupt. Klein and an innocent bystander are killed during the shooting. Two persons who attend to the party (Franklin Morris and Leanne Bayer) say they saw Smith shooting at Klien and Gibson. A gun is recovered at the scene and eight shell casings are also found. The shell casings are not tested to see if they are were fired by the gun found at the scene. DNA is also not collected from the recovered gun. Other party goers say that more than one person was shooting at the party. A gun is found laying underneath Klein. In the clip of the firearm, it is missing three bullets. Both guns recovered at the scene are 9mm. Police assume that during a shoot out between Klein and Smith, Klein was killed. It seemed to fit with what witnesses said about multiple shooters. The 9mm handgun underneath Klein is never tested with any of the spent shell casings.

During the investigation, homicide Detective Jacobs receives an anonymous phone message. The person says, “Carter Stewart is the one who killed Klien and that girl.” Detective Jacobs makes some inquiries about whether Stewart was at the party. Word on the street is that Stewart was at the party. Then Detective Jacobs also finds that Stewart has an extensive criminal record and is a rival gang member to Klein and Gibson.

John Smith is ultimately arrested on a murder warrant in Spokane, Washington and has to be extradited to Ohio. When Detective Jacobs interviews John Smith, he asks him why he ran to Spokane. Smith said he knew there was a warrant out for his arrest. Smith is ultimately tried before a jury and is convicted of both murders. He is sentenced to 48 to life in prison. During his trial, both eyewitnesses testify that Smith was the shooter. The jury also hears about Smith fleeing to Spokane, and the prosecution argues that flight is an admission of guilt. The information about Carter Stewart is never turned over to Smith’s attorneys.

Ten years after his conviction, the Innocence Project (IP) takes up John Smith’s case. They interview Leanne Bayer, who ultimately says she did not actually see who was shooting and she was pressured by people to say it was Smith. IP attorneys get other affidavits from partygoers that say that Bayer was inside the apartment when the shooting occurred outside. After the entire Smith file is turned over to IP attorneys, they find written notes from Detective Jacobs that Carter Stewart could have been a possible suspect. In addition, they find an audio recording of the anonymous caller message about Carter Stewart.

IP attorneys successfully argue to an appellate court that the spent shell casings and the firearm be tested. Ballistic experts find the following.

Ballistics Finding One

Of the spent shell casings, three of the eight were fired by the 9mm handgun allegedly fired by John Smith.

Ballistics Finding Two

IP attorneys also successfully argue to an appellate court for the gun allegedly fired by John Smith be tested for DNA. The DNA results are as follows.

DNA Finding One

DNA Finding Two

John Smith can be excluded as a contributor of the DNA mixture on the handle and trigger of the 9mm handgun.

DNA Finding Three

IP attorneys find that in Ohio, persons who are arrested and slated in a local jail must submit to DNA collection. A year after the shooting and John Smith’s conviction at trial, Carter Stewart is arrested and held in the jail in Ohio. His DNA was collected.

IP attorneys successfully argue to an appellate court that Carter Stewart’s DNA be tested with the DNA collected from the 9mm handgun.

DNA Expert Findings and Conclusion

For this discussion, answer the first question below, meeting all the posting requirements. Start thinking about the other three questions. Your professor will follow-up with them during the week.

1. What is a Brady violation? Provide examples.

2. What is a Habeas post conviction petition?

3. Are there potential Brady violations that need to be pursued if you were an IP attorney? What are they, and why?

4. Does new evidence exist that may or may not support a Habeas Corpus action on behalf of John Smith?

dolution

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

dolution

dolution.

This exercise can give you experience locating strategy-evaluation information. Use of the Internet coupled with published sources of information can significantly enhance the strategy-evaluation process. Performance information on competitors, for example, can help put into perspective a firm’s own performance. Instructions Step 1 Search the Internet for information on Nestlé. Prepare a strategy-evaluation report for your instructor. Include in your report a summary of Nestlé’s strategies and performance in 2015 and a summary of your conclusions regarding the effectiveness of Nestlé’s strategies. Step 2 Based on your analysis, do you feel that Nestlé is pursuing effective strategies? What recommendations would you offer to Nestlé’s chief executive officer?

dolution

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

dolution

dolution.

You work for a marketing firm that has just landed a contract with Run-of-the-Mills to help them promote three of their products: penguin patties, raskels, and kipples. All of these products have been on the market for some time, but, to entice better sales, Run-of-the-Mills wants to try a new advertisement that will market two of the products that consumers will likely consume together. As a former economics student, you know that complements are typically consumed together while substitutes can take the place of other goods.

Run-of-the-Mills provides your marketing firm with the following data: When the price of penguin patties decreases by 5%, the quantity of raskels sold decreases by 4% and the quantity of kipples sold increases by 6%. Your job is to use the cross-price elasticity between penguin patties and the other goods to determine which goods your marketing firm should advertise together.

Complete the first column of the following table by computing the cross-price elasticity between penguin patties and raskels, and then between penguin patties and kipples. In the second column, determine if penguin patties are a complement to or a substitute for each of the goods listed. Finally, complete the final column by indicating which good you should recommend marketing with penguin patties.

Relative to Penguin Patties

Recommend Marketing with Penguin Patties (Yes or No)
Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand Complement or Substitute
Raskels
Kipples

dolution

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

dolution

dolution.

Waiting in Line A quality-control manager at an amusement park feels that the amount of time that people spend waiting in line for the American Eagle roller coaster is too long. To determine if a new loading/unloading procedure is effective in reducing wait time in line, he measures the amount of time (in minutes) people are waiting in line for seven days. After implementing the new procedure, he again measures the amount of time (in minutes) people are waiting in line for seven days and obtains the data on the next page. To make a reasonable comparison, he chooses days when weather conditions are alike.
Treat each day as a block and the wait times before and after the procedure as the treatment.

(a) Using the methods introduced in this section, determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the two loading procedures are resulting in different measurements of the wait time at the  level of significance.

(b) Using the methods introduced in Section 11.2, determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the two loading procedures are resulting in different measurements of the wait time at the  level of significance.

(c) Compare the -values of both approaches. Can you conclude that the method presented in this section is a generalization of the matched-pairs -test?

dolution

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"